Files
Dan MilneandClaude Opus 4.8 017dfdff0e Harden OIDC token endpoints from security review
Fixes from review of the device flow / introspection / DCR work:

Introspection over-disclosure (RFC 7662):
- Restrict introspection to authorized callers — the client a token was issued
  to, or a resource server registered (resource_identifiers) to serve the token's
  bound RFC 8707 audience. Unauthorized callers get {active:false}, disclosing
  nothing, instead of any confidential client reading any token.
- Scope-gate disclosed claims: username only with the email scope, groups only
  with the groups scope (mirrors userinfo). ADR 0005.

Tokens minted for revoked users:
- Re-check application.user_allowed?(user) at mint time in the device, refresh,
  and authorization-code grants (covers app-active, user-active, group
  membership). A user deactivated or removed from the allowed group between
  approval and the token request is refused with access_denied. The refresh
  check runs before rotation so a denied refresh has no side effects.

Device authorization hardening:
- Require confidential clients to authenticate, and require PKCE (code_challenge)
  up front for clients that require it, so an intercepted device_code plus a
  known public client_id cannot redeem tokens.
- Merge (not overwrite) the shared consent record on device approval.

Tests: new oidc_introspection_test and oidc_mint_authorization_test; existing
PKCE/claims tests updated to grant app access (they created ungrouped apps and
relied on the token endpoint not checking authorization). Full suite green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01F7cwhwDJp3MJJDoNPVE6zq
2026-07-19 13:19:41 +10:00
..
2025-10-29 16:08:49 +11:00